Is there any case law where evidence of an opposing party’s objective has been found to be unhelpful?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Cymax Stores Inc. v Coleco Investments Inc., 2019 BCSC 492 (CanLII):
In Athwal at para. 45, the court cited Prenn v. Simmonds, [1971] 3 All E.R. 237 at 240-241, which describes such evidence as “unhelpful”. In Prenn, the court made the following sensible observation: … The words used may, and often do, represent a formula which means different things to each side, yet may be accepted because that is the only way to get ‘agreement’ and in the hope that disputes will not arise. The only course then can be to try to ascertain the ‘natural’ meaning. Far more, and indeed totally, dangerous is to admit evidence of one party’s objective –even if this is known to the other party. However strongly pursued this may be, the other party may only be willing to give it partial recognition, and in world of give and taken, men often have to be satisfied with less than they want. So, again, it would be a matter of speculation how far the common intention was that the particular objective should be realised. …
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the current state of the law in Canada when it comes to rationalizing the subjective evidence of the parties' intentions with objective evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a successful party have the right to claim special costs when the successful party is in a relationship with an opposing party? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the law of agency apply when one party gives explicit or implicit authority to another party (the principal) to enter contracts with third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party recover in restitution where another party has been unjustly enriched at that party's expense? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party who has not produced evidence in favour of their position, or has no reasonable explanation for failing to call the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a jury to decide whether or not to accept or reject an opposing party's evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the intention or understanding of a party to a transaction where a party intended to transfer a vehicle to another party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for exclusion of a party while another party is giving evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a party can have challenged a foreign court’s procedural defects in that foreign proceeding, can that party collaterally attack the foreign procedural process before the Canadian court at the enforcement stage? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a no evidence motion where a real estate agent defendant argued that there was no expert evidence sufficient to establish a standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
