Can a court impute income for intentional under-employment even without finding that there was bad faith on the part of the payor?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from S.L.C. v. C.J.R.C., 2014 BCSC 1814 (CanLII):

The court can impute income for intentional under-employment even without finding that there was bad faith on the part of the payor. The question is whether the payor is earning what the payor is capable of earning. See Barker v. Barker, 2005 BCCA 177 at para. 19, and Koch v. Koch, 2012 BCCA 378 at para. 38.

Other Questions


Does a finding of bad faith on the part of the spouse in a claim for imputation of income for intentional unemployment or under employment require bad faith? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party intentionally underemployed or unemployed intentionally imputing income under section 19(1)(a) of the Employment Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court impute income for the purposes of imputing income? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court impute income to a spouse or former spouse under section 19 of the Income Tax Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
When will a court set a payor’s average income under s. 16 of the Income Tax Code? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a payor parent be held to be intentionally underemployed if he or she chooses not to work when capable of earning income? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court impute income to a payor parent? (British Columbia, Canada)
How is a payor's income calculated when the payor’s income has fluctuated in previous years? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for malicious intent in the context of an appeal against the findings of a finding of malicious intent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the court consider when imputing income from a parent? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.