In King v. McHugh (2009), 82 C.P.C. (6th) 263 (ONSC), the court applied this reasoning. At para. 13, Mr. Justice Gunsolus explained: The rule that equitable set-off cannot be asserted as a defence to a claim on a bill of exchange is a well settled one, with the principle basis being supported by many years of jurisprudence. The principle underlining the rule is that a bill of exchange is meant to be in the nature of cash….
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.