In describing the course of dealing test, the reasons of the vice-chancellor in Williams v. Hensman do not refer to the doctrine of estoppel, nor do his reasons invoke the concept of detrimental reliance. It is possible that Southin J.A. may have [page256] viewed the course of dealing test as a species of estoppel because both legal principles are designed to prevent unfairness or injustice as between the parties. However, the elements of each doctrine are different, as are the requirements of proof.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.