What are the costs of litigating under Rule 66 of the Insurance Act?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from King v. Horth, 2010 BCSC 360 (CanLII):
The cost provisions of Rule 66 exist to keep the cost of litigating under the rule relatively low: Reid v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2000 BCSC 1334.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a successful litigant be held liable for the costs of a successful plaintiff who deliberately provides false evidence at any stage of the litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will an insurer be required to continue to pay disability benefits to an insured who has been spied on by the insurer? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a successful litigant entitled to the basic costs of an insurance company? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to pay defendants' costs throughout the course of the litigation if he does not receive his costs until March 2017? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is security for costs of an appeal cost more readily than security for trial costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a payment made by an insurer under a life insurance policy an indemnification of the insured under the policy? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a vehicle that is insured for farm use and pleasure use more than twice as much as the vehicle insured for the purpose of transporting the insured to and from work? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of the BCSC’s Costs provisions in the context of litigation costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has 9-1(6)(c) of the Rules on litigation costs been interpreted in the context of insurance coverage? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
