Does the corporate veil need to be pierced?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from General Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Inc. v. Emil's Fun, Food & Spirits Emporium Ltd., 2006 SKQB 470 (CanLII):

There are no circumstances that lend any support to the submission that the corporate veil should be pierced. The facts do not justify a departure from the rule in Salomon v. Salomom, supra, since GRJ was legally incorporated and therefore must be treated like any other independent person not only with respect to its individual rights but also with respect to its liabilities. No exceptional circumstances exist to warrant a piercing of the corporate veil.

Other Questions


What is the corporate year end of a corporation? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for using corporal punishment in school? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff be able to bring a claim against a corporation for negligence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the costs of the application to the Court of Appeal against the Corporation of Colchester? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the Respondent Corporation been challenged in the Court of Appeal for failing to provide adequate notice of a dangerous condition? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a corporation bring a defamation action against its officers or shareholders? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the authority of the Corporation of the Township of Whitby? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a plaintiff recover damages from the Corporation of Camden for failing to install a drainage system properly? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there any case law where the Master held that the agent Gilpin was not an officer of a company within the meaning of Rule 327(2) of the Corporations Act? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the proper examination of an officer who represents a corporation? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.