In my view, this matter does not lend itself to a section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 (section 35) analysis primarily because section 35 is not adequately engaged on the record before me. I will have more to say about this later in these reasons. However, it is important not to lose sight of the policy which dictates restraint in constitutional analysis, as “unnecessary constitutional pronouncements may prejudice future cases”: Phillips v. Nova Scotia (Commission of Inquiry into the Westray Mine Tragedy), 1995 CanLII 86 (SCC), [1995] 2 S.C.R. 97 at para. 9. Regarding the section 35 argument, this application is fraught with difficulties. I do not intend to itemize all of them, but I will highlight those which are particularly problematic.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.