Is consent required on the face of a summary disposition order?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Hyland v. Calder, 1920 CanLII 138 (SK CA):

In Harrison v. Wright, 13 M. & W. 816, 2 D. & L. 695, 14 L.J. Ex. 196, it was held that the consent must appear on the face of the order. Without desiring to go that far, I would say that, if the consent or request does not appear on the face of the order, there must be other evidence of it in the appeal book in order to entitle us to hold that the learned Judge had jurisdiction to make a summary disposition of the matter.

Other Questions


When will a judge order a summary order against an over-holding tenant? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test of the principle of consent between the consent of the parties? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the range of dispositions handed down for a breach of a court order? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can an appeal against an order requiring costs to be paid forthwith after taxation be paid? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is an affidavit filed in breach of the requirements of the Rules of Civil Procedure requiring strict compliance? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a by-law requiring pedestrians to cross the tracks between a railway line and a public road require them to cross at a walking pace? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a consent judgment be set aside if the consent was executed by counsel and issued by the court? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for granting an interim order to order a temporary stay of custody of a child? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does summary disposition always have to be either mandatory or otherwise mandatory? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court require that a document be submitted so that the contents of the document can be reviewed by the court to determine whether it is privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.