What is the connection between the two decisions at issue in an application for judicial review?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Chiasson v. Canada (Attorney General), 2006 FC 1208 (CanLII):
The connection is superficial. The two decisions at issue were not made at the same time. The source of these two amounts does not result from the same circumstances or the same facts. This situation does not satisfy the conditions prescribed by Truehope Nutritional Support v. Canada 2004 FC 658 (CanLII), [2004] F.C.J. No. 806, paragraph 6. Accordingly, points 1 to 3 of the application must be the subject of an application for judicial review different from the application for judicial review for point 4. (a) Thirty-day time limit
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a judicial review application directed against a negative PRRA decision moot where the Applicant for judicial review has been removed from or voluntarily left Canada? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
For the purposes of denying a motion for judicial review of a decision by the Board of Arbitration for Justice denying an application to review the denial of the motion, in what circumstances will the motion be reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for judicial review of the US Supreme Court's decision not to grant a judicial review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the scope of judicial review of a decision made by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency against a request by the Sierra Club for a judicial review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable in a judicial review of a visa officer's decision? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a judicial review application be considered both in the merits of a decision on the professional misconduct of a bankruptcy trustee and in the subsequent decision determining the appropriate sanctions? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
When a hearing officer disagrees with a decision made by the reviewing officer on the issues with which he disagreed with the hearing officer, how will the review officer's decision be considered? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a reconsideration decision not to be reviewed during a judicial review of an initial decision? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the appropriate standard of review in an application for judicial review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
