Can a mortgagor redeem after a final order?

Saskatchewan, Canada

The following excerpt is from Moose Jaw Credit Union Limited v. Kjarsgaard, 1982 CanLII 2711 (SK QB):

At the root of this is the concept of "once a mortgage always a mortgage", whereby the parties' rights continue even after the mortgage has been foreclosed. A mortgagor may redeem after final order under exceptional circumstances because the mortgage is considered unsatisfied so long as the mortgagee retains the land. As well, following final order the mortgagee may yet enforce the mortgagor's covenant to pay, but this will have the effect of opening the foreclosure and revesting in the mortgagor the redemption privilege. However, if the mortgagee in any way as owner alters his relation to the land, he elects to take it and foregoes the debt, but not until then (see Anglin, J., at page 895 in Davidson v. Sharpe, 1920 CanLII 83 (SCC), [1920] 1 W.W.R. 888).

Other Questions

Does a final order for foreclosure extinguish an insurable interest? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for interlocutory application in an action made either before or after final judgment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When a mortgagee has obtained final foreclosure and disposed of the property, can the mortgagor recover a deficiency? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can an appeal against an order requiring costs to be paid forthwith after taxation be paid? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can an assignee make a payment to the mortgagor of a property in order to get a case out of the provisions of the Property Tax Act? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a final order for foreclosure be made ineffective? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is an express promise necessary after a final account has been stated? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What action does a mortgagee in purchasing the mortgaged property at a tax sale place him in the position of holding the title, which he subsequently procures, subject to the right of the mortgagor to redeem? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a mortgagee who has obtained a final order of foreclosure have a right to sue on the covenant in their mortgage? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is an interlocutory order that directs how the declarations of right are to be worked out in the context of a final judgment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.