To the extent that the Complainant’s mother is arguing that proceeding with her daughter’s complaint will have a deterrent effect, this must be weighed against the argument that allowing a late-filed complaint to be accepted, in the absence of a compelling explanation for the delay, could encourage other complainants to ignore the substantive time limits set out in the Code: A obo B v. School District No. C and another, 2009 BCHRT 256, para. 101; Johansen v. Southern Railway of B.C. and another, 2011 BCHRT 239, para. 33.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.