Is the compensation principle applied strictly or inflexibly?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Flammia v. Royal Glen Eagle, 2014 ONSC 7522 (CanLII):
In IBM v. Waterman, Cromwell J. for the majority explained at paragraph 35, that the compensation principle cannot be, and is not, applied strictly or inflexibly in a manner that is divorced from other considerations.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the principle of corporate separateness override the equitable principles of equitable principles in the context of vicarious liability? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the legal principles applied in an application to remove an estate trustee? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the principles of statutory compulsion and what are the implications of the principles set out in Soules and White? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the principle of autonomy of a documentary credit apply? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the principles of compensation under the Divorce Act? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the discoveryability principle apply to determine whether an action is statute barred because the statement of claim was not issued until August 18, 2011? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the mootness principle apply to interveners in a matter of public interest? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of traditional trust principles against the principles of equity underpinning fair sharing of wealth during a marriage? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will the discoverability principle apply when a plaintiff is injured in a motor vehicle accident? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the principle of reasonableness apply when assessing costs? (Ontario, Canada)
