He did conclude, however, similar objection could not be taken to the cameras in the storage areas, in the loading dock or in the parking lot. In particular, he placed no restriction on the use of the camera in the parking lot but stated the company was only entitled to retain the loading dock camera and the cameras in the storage areas on the first floor so long as it continues to use them in a rotating fashion and for security purposes only. (2) Ross v. Rosedale Transport Ltd., [2003] C.L.A.D. No. 237.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.