In Rumley v. British Columbia, 2001 SCC 69, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 184 at para. 33, McLachlin C.J.C. observes that while the CPA clearly contemplates that the predominance of common issues “over issues affecting only individual members” will be a factor in the preferability inquiry, “it makes equally clear that predominance should not be a factor at the commonality stage”. She concludes at para. 33 that “the question at the commonality stage is, at least under the British Columbia Class Proceedings Act, quite narrow”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.