What is the meaning of the common law implied undertaking rule?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Kitchenham v. Axa Insurance, 2005 CanLII 16620 (ON SC):

Carthy J.A. cited the same passage from Goodman v. Rossi quoted above, and (at para. 6) confirmed that it is the identity of the recipient and the use to which the recipient intends to put the documents that are the focus of the common law implied undertaking rule: It is “used by the other party” and “use them to the detriment of the party who has produced them” that are the keynote phrases.

Other Questions


Can Rule 30.1.01 of the implied undertaking rule apply to an accident benefits insurer? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the financial situation of the parties be taken into account in determining the amount of a costs award under Rule 24 or Rule 18 of the Family Law Rules? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the financial situation of the parties be taken into account in determining the amount of costs awarded under Rule 24 or Rule 18 of the Family Law Rules? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a judge order an order under Rule 31.03(2) of the Rules 31.10(1) and Rule 30.10? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for an undertaking under Rule 30 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for pleading under Rule 21.01, 25.11 and 25.06 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Ontario, Canada)
How does rule 16 of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to summary judgment? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for the use of a motion of common law common law for unjust enrichment? (Ontario, Canada)
Is Rule 2 (2) of the Rules of Civil Procedure sufficient to add a fourth fundamental purpose for costs? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the common law imply that real estate is sold in any particular state or is fit for any particular purpose? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.