Can a self-represented litigant prosecute an action that had not yet been certified?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Fantl v. Transamerica Life Canada, 2008 CanLII 17304 (ON SC):

See also Fenn v. Ontario, [2004] O.J. No. 2763 (S.C.J.), where a self-represented litigant was not allowed to prosecute an action that had been commenced under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 without a lawyer, notwithstanding that the action had not yet been certified. A lawyer for the representative plaintiff is one of the checks and balances in the design of the legislation that takes into account that absent class members are bound by the outcome of the proceedings, unless they opt out.

Other Questions


Is a family law litigant responsible for the actions they take in the litigation? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for certifying a wrongful dismissal action as a national class action? (Ontario, Canada)
Can estoppel prevent an action from being litigated again? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the implications of a motion judge's decisions regarding the restoration of an action to the trial list under r.48.11 and the dismissal of an Action for Delay pursuant to r.24.01? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a distinction between matrimonial litigation and other civil litigation? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for laches in an action brought by a party who has been a party to an action for over a year? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for certifying a class action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for indemnifying successful litigants for the cost of litigation? (Ontario, Canada)
Is the certification stage of a class action a test of the merits of the action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for dismissing an action as prescribed on the basis that the cause of action had accrued more than 6 years before the Statement of Claim was issued? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.