Is a defendant liable for damages that are not related to crumbling skull injuries?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Harris v Gill, 2019 BCSC 1665 (CanLII):

The defendant is not liable for damages that were not caused by the injury: Brewster v. Li, 2013 BCSC 774 at para. 78 [Brewster]. Under the crumbling skull doctrine, a defendant “need not compensate the plaintiff for any debilitating effects of the pre-existing condition which the plaintiff would have experienced anyway”: Athey at para. 35.

Other Questions


Is a defendant liable for damages that are not for crumbling skull injuries? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a defendant liable for damage suffered due to a crumbling skull? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a plaintiff has a crumbling skull, does the crumbling skull rule entitle her to additional damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has a thin skull or crumbling skull injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for additional damage to a plaintiff's asymptomatic, but not debilitating, pre-existing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff liable for any additional damage caused by a crumbling skull? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant be liable for causing nervous shock and physical injury to a plaintiff by falsely claiming that her husband had been injured in an accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant be held liable for foreseeable damages for breach of contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.