The claimant argues that difficulties in identifying or locating assets caused by one party should not be permitted to frustrate a fair division of those assets that should have been available for division. Where there are gaps in the evidence which could be resolved or filled by one party’s disclosure, adverse inferences can be drawn against the party who was most capable of filling the gaps and making full disclosure: Clark v. Clark (1974) B.C.J. No. 651 at paras. 11 and 12.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.