Is there genuine lis between the parties to the issue of non-removal?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from M.A.W. v. J.A.W., 2013 ONCJ 34 (CanLII):

[35] The evidence is clear that there is no genuine lis between the parties with respect to the issue of non-removal. No evidence was led that either party has any intention of voluntarily removing the child from the jurisdiction, save and except through the operation of the deportation order itself. See: Martin v. Royal, [2012] ONCJ 202. In fact, the mother is fighting very hard to remain in Canada and has no desire to go to Jamaica with the child.

Other Questions


Can a party bring an issue of issue estoppel against the party seeking to relitigate the matter? (Ontario, Canada)
Can issue estoppel prevent parties from re-litigating issues previously decided in another court proceeding? (Ontario, Canada)
If a successful party accepts an offer to settle, can the successful party be ordered to pay all or part of the unsuccessful party’s costs? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the evidentiary burden placed on a responding party to support its position that a genuine issue does not exist? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for using the term issue "issue" in the context of the issue? (Ontario, Canada)
If the parties cannot agree on the issue of costs in a personal injury action, can the parties make written submissions to the Respondent to the Application to the Court of Appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining a genuine issue for trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proof against a party who is not a party to the birth of the child? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a party entitled to rely on the fact that another party has retained counsel for advice in the negotiation process? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any genuine issue requiring a trial? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.