An important factor to consider when assessing probative value is the opportunity for collusion: R v. Shearing, 2002 SCC 58, at para 40: The theory of similar fact evidence turns largely on the improbability of coincidence. Collusion, by offering an alternative explanation for the “coincidence” of evidence emanating from different witnesses, destroys its probative value, and therefore the basis for its admissibility.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.