The chambers judge held (at para. 18) that there was “no issue over the jurisdiction of the court to set off costs against spousal support, or for that matter child support”. He questioned whether it was appropriate to set off child support given that child support is the right of the child. Citing Starr v. Starr, 2008 BCSC 1519, the chambers judge declined to set off child support “retroactively or in the future”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.