Ritchie J. further stated at p. 6: ... The central question in deciding any case involving the defence of automatism is whether or not the accused was suffering from a disease of the mind. The opinions of psychiatrists go no further than characterizing the condition in which the appellant was found as being "a dissociative state" but it is clear at least since the case of Bratty v. A.-G. Northern Ireland, [1963] A.C. 386, that the question of whether or not such a state amounts to "a disease of the mind" is a question of law for the Judge to determine.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.