What is the test for establishing a causation in a motor vehicle accident case?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Qualizza v. Lee et al, 2007 BCSC 303 (CanLII):

Causation in negligence cases is established where the injury of the plaintiff would not have happened “but for” the negligence of the defendant or where the defendant’s negligence is found to have “materially contributed” to the injury: Athey v. Leonarti, 1996 CanLII 183 (SCC), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458 at ¶14-15. Therefore, the plaintiff bears the onus of proving that the defendant caused or contributed to the injury.

Other Questions


In a motor vehicle accident case, is causation established if the but for test is unworkable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing causation between a motor vehicle accident and a subsequent accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing causation in a motor vehicle accident case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident case, is there any case law where a wife who was a passenger in the vehicle was found to have been driving at the time of the collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a motor vehicle accident and a subsequent motor vehicle collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the defence of inevitable accident in a motor vehicle accident case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a motor vehicle accident is an accident or an accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident reconstruction case, can the accident reconstruction experts provide any assistance? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a prima facie case of negligence in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident case, is a driver allowed to drive his vehicle while unlicensed? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.