Is it redundant to add another party to the same plan?
Nova Scotia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Nova Scotia (Community Services) v B.R., 2010 NSFC 3 (CanLII):
He argued that the case of Canadian Transportation v. Canadian Press et al., supra., was analogous to the case before the court in that if one of the parties is presenting a plan, it would be redundant to add another person as a party to present the exact same plan. He highlights Gruchy, J.’s comments at page 164:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the criteria for disbursement of party party-party costs? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does the execution of a release agreement immunize a party from liability in a third party action? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the legal test used to determine whether a party has to pay a third party's costs? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for determining that a party has no right, title, or legally protected interest in lands that have been claimed by two parties? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is there a distinction between first party and third party insurers? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for supervision of an administrative structure where the purpose of supervision is to balance the interests of parties against one another? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a party can proceed with an application? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the burden or onus of a party seeking the production of a document? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a party who brings a spouse's home into the marriage a grounds for unequal division? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s litigation plan and certification order relevant to common issues? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
