What is the test for interpreting the meaning of words in legislation?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Bond v Deeb, 2013 CanLII 54599 (ON SCSM):
13. Defence counsel also referred me to the cardinal rule of legislative interpretation as set out in Bell ExpressVu Limited Parnership v. Rex, 2002 SCC 42 (CanLII), [2002] 2 S.C.R. 559 at para. 26-29. Words in legislation are to be read in their entire context and in their grammatical and ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act and the intention of the legislature.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the court interpreted section 19(1)(a) of the Child Support Guidelines and interpreted the meaning of the word "intentionally" in relation to child support? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will an arbitrator be bound to follow the interpretation of Arbitrator Starkman’s interpretation of the Interpretation of the Arbitrator's Interpretation in a dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Attorney General's submission in the Superior Court of Justice have any grounds to argue that the meaning of the word "definite" in the definition of a word? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of the word "sexually diverse" in the definition of sex discrimination? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for ambiguity in the meaning of the word “interpretation”? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court interpreted the meaning and scope of the word "security" in the Canada Security Act? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of uninsured motorist coverage legislation? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any interpretative problem with the meaning of the word "sexual immorality"? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the meaning of the word "alibi" affect a defendant's right to a fair trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the "golden rule" of interpretation of statutory words? (Ontario, Canada)
