What is the burden of proving negligence against the driver in a motor vehicle accident?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Bassi v. Bassi, 2010 BCSC 1896 (CanLII):

If the driver can show how the accident occurred without negligence, and such explanation is a reasonable one, then the burden is again on the plaintiff to prove negligence. If the explanation is equally consistent with negligence and with no negligence, then the burden to establish negligence still remains upon the plaintiff. (Ballard v. North BB.R.Co. (1923), 60 Sc.L.R. 441 at p.5).

Other Questions


In a motor vehicle accident where a bee flew into the vehicle, landed on the driver's stomach and he froze, can the driver be found to have been negligent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving contributory negligence in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident involving a stolen vehicle, can the driver of the stolen vehicle be held liable for damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident, can the driver's negligence be inferred? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a motor vehicle accident case, is a driver allowed to drive his vehicle while unlicensed? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between a motor vehicle accident and a subsequent motor vehicle collision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the finding of fact in a motor vehicle accident where a driver misjudged the speed and distance of a vehicle travelling at 50 to 70 kilometres per hour? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a motor vehicle accident is an accident or an accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving liability and quantum in a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove negligence in a motor vehicle accident case? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.