What is the burden on Prior to show that the easement provides no practical benefit?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Prior Holdings Ltd. v The Source Enterprises Ltd., 2019 BCSC 1871 (CanLII):

The burden is on Prior to show that the easement provides no practical benefit: Tri-X Timber Corporation v. Rutherford, 2012 BCCA 71 at para. 29.

Other Questions


What is the burden upon the petitioner to prove that continuation of the covenant is not practical benefit? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a joint tenant who takes the entire benefit of real property through survivorship must take the burden associated with the benefit? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between benefit and detriment for a person who provides household services without compensation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a right-of-way easement that provides access to a parcel of land that runs from north to south? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that she was not a resident of B.C. for at least a year prior to the filing of her petition in this proceeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of establishing that shared use of the matrimonial home with the respondent is a "practical impossibility"? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the burden of proof change when the trial judge reversed the burden? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that a prior relationship between a client and a law firm prior to the disclosure of confidential information? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of a mere easement in the context of an easement application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an easement over a neighbouring property and the existing easement? (British Columbia, Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.