What are the findings of an independent review of comments made by a government minister to a journalist?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Mihajlovics v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2004 FC 215 (CanLII):
Viewed against this background, there was no actual bias nor did the comments create a reasonable apprehension of bias. They all related to credibility and lack of objectivity (see Kumar v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) [1988] F.C.J. No. 240).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for an application to compel the Court to approve the publication of both the findings of an independent review and the analysis of both findings? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does a Minister's Minister of Employment and Immigration (Minister of Employment & Immigration) need to be appointed a Minister of Justice? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is the panel’s decision that a Minister of Justice should not be allowed to appoint a Minister for Employment and Immigration (e.g. Minister of Work and Pensions) to the Minister of Employment and Training (Employment), or is the panel's decision patently unreasonable? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the procedure upon finding a reviewable error on judicial review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
In what circumstances will the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration review the decision of a visa officer under review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can the government respond to a defense counsel's summation comments that impugned the integrity of the government's case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted by not raising a claim on direct review or collateral review barred from raising it on collateral review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have courts relied on the findings of an independent review of the facts in the case of People v West? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing the dismissal of a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, how do we review the factual findings and legal conclusions de novo? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When reviewing a denial of a motion to suppress, how do we review the findings of the previous district court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
