The circumstances of this case are analogous to those considered by the BCCA in Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCCA 422. Under consideration by the court was what was characterized as a deficient benefit compensation scheme for those injured in the course of military service. In dismissing the section 7 argument, Groberman J.A. observed that the case was not concerned “…with a deprivation imposed by government, but rather with the inadequacy of a government program designed to ameliorate the situation of the plaintiffs” (at para. 89).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.