I am satisfied that any “leave benefits” available through the B.C.M.A. are not a family asset. Any amounts which may be available represent replacement of income and income per se is not a family asset: Matheson v. Matheson [1987] B.C.J. (Q.L.) No. 896 (B.C.S.C.). Accordingly, I find that neither the possibility of a retroactive payment of income to July, 2003 or a “leave benefit” payment is a family asset.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.