What are the implications of the UNA v.AHS decision on the Award for Arbitration for Human Rights?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Alberta Union of Provincial Employees for review of an arbitration v Legal Aid Society of Alberta, 2021 CanLII 98315 (AB LRB):
The Union argues that the Award is “eminently distinguishable” from the UNA v. AHS decision. It says that the Award is essentially a rights determination under the collective agreement and that any determination arising from the Award was based on a rights determination and an interpretation of the collective agreement.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have decisions by the Chief Commissioner of Human Rights and Human Rights have been treated in the context of discrimination cases? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts treated the issue of human trafficking in the context of human rights legislation? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the obligations of the sending state towards the detained person under the Vienna Convention on Human Rights? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will an arbitrator be found to have misconduct during the course of an arbitration? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the implications of leadings cases on the mobility rights of custodial parents? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a draft human rights settlement agreement enforceable? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the difference between human rights legislation and the law of tort? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the range of general and pecuniary damages for discrimination against an employer in a human rights case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the burden of proof in a human rights case? (Alberta, Canada)
How to balance the Charter-protected rights of mobility rights and freedom of association with those of the public good? (Alberta, Canada)
