What is the definition of patent unreasonableness under the ATA?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Milczarski v. Lloyd, 2016 BCSC 800 (CanLII):
The ATA does not define patent unreasonableness as it relates to a finding of fact or law. In Manz v. Sundher, 2009 BCCA 92, at para. 39, the court discussed the issue as follows:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the Court of Appeal in Dunsmuir hold that a patent unreasonableness standard set forth in s. 59(3) and (4) of the Anti-Patent Unreasonableness Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the definition of a "patently unreasonable" claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an unreasonable decision and a patently unreasonable decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of the Court of Appeal Tribunal’s "unreasonable" and "patently unreasonable" interpretation of policy by the tribunal? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the common law definition of patent unreasonableness? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for patent unreasonableness? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test of no evidence to support patently unreasonable claims? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for patent unreasonableness in labour relations review? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is patent unreasonableness the standard of review for findings of fact or law or exercise of discretion under the Administrative Tribunals Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a patently unreasonable decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
