The “arguable relevance” threshold has been described as “not a particularly high bar”. See Nassiah v. Peel Regional Police Services Board, 2006 HRTO 18, at para. 8, and the cases cited therein. While “arguable relevance” may not be a high onus for the requesting party to satisfy, there must be a nexus between the sought-after material(s) and the subject-matter of the application.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.