In St. Michael’s Hospital v. Ontario Nurses’ Association (2013), 235 L.A.C. (4th) 389, the employer posted three temporary positions. The union argued that they did not fall within the specific circumstances described in the collective agreement when temporary vacancies were deemed to exist. The arbitrator concluded: 38 … it can be inferred that by expressly mentioning those circumstances that give rise to a temporary vacancy, the parties have intentionally excluded other circumstances not so identified. (The expressio unius exclusio alterius rule of interpretation.)….
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.