The leading case in Ontario relating to the application of this provision is Drygala v. Pauli.[4] Under the framework provided for in that case, the trial judge is required to consider three questions when applying that provision. First, is the parent or spouse intentionally under-employed or unemployed? Second, if so, is the intentional under-employment or unemployment required by her reasonable educational needs, her reasonable health needs or the needs of a child? Third, if the answer to the second question is no, what income is it appropriate to impute in the circumstances?[5]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.