Subject to certain caveats, deference is owed to a motion judge’s exercise of discretion. In Banro, LeBel J. wrote at para. 41: The application of forum non conveniens is an exercise of discretion reviewable in accordance with the principle of deference to discretionary decisions: an appeal court should intervene only if the motion judge erred in principle, misapprehended or failed to take account of material evidence, or reached an unreasonable decision (see Young v. Tyco International of Canada Ltd., at para. 27).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.