How have the courts treated the evidence in a sexual assault case?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Chirkov v. Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario, 2018 HRTO 366 (CanLII):
There is little dispute between the parties regarding the evidence. Rather the main point of contention is the conclusions I should draw from the evidence that has been presented by them. As is the normal course, the applicant bears the onus of proving that the respondent violated his Code rights on the balance of probabilities, see Shaw v. Phipps, 2012 ONCA 155 (CanLII) (“Shaw”).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.
Other Questions
How has the Court treated sexual assault and indecent assault cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts treated the credibility of the complainant's evidence in a sexual assault trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current sentencing range for an assault where the accused has pleaded guilty to a charge of assault, assault and sexual assault? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court sentence an offender who sexually assaulted a 15 year old girl who was sexually assaulted by friends of her parents who plied her victim with alcohol? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of the Court of Appeal's ruling in cases involving sexual assault cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted evidence in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
How is corroborating evidence treated in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for obtaining medical records and sexual activity records in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the rule on cross-examination in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for identification evidence in a sexual assault case? (Ontario, Canada)
