Therefore, while the applicants suggest that the adjudicator dismissed evidence on the basis that it was from outside the grievance period, the adjudicator appears to have dismissed the evidence for other reasons as well. Courts generally should not substitute their view of the relevance of evidence for that of the decision-maker except when the rejection of relevant evidence has such an impact on the fairness of the proceeding that it unavoidably leads to the conclusion that there is been a breach of natural justice (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières v. Larocque, 1993 CanLII 162 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 471, at page 491).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.