The appellant further argues that the chambers judge, in the interests of the proper administration of justice, should have exercised her discretion in favour of setting aside the default judgment because the truth of the respondent’s allegations of abuse must be enquired into in any event when the court assesses damages. On this point the appellant relies on the decision of McEwan J. in May v. Williams, [1997] B.C.J. No. 900 (Q.L.) (S.C.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.