Mr. Justice Low considered only the application to reinstate the appeal, because if it was not reinstated, the application for late filing would be moot. He applied the tests set out in Frew v. Roberts (1990), 44 C.P.C. (2d) 34 (B.C.C.A.): whether the delay is inordinate; whether it has been explained or is inexplicable; and whether it has caused prejudice to the respondent, and concluded (at para. 25): I am not persuaded that it would be in the interests of justice to grant the extensions sought by the appellant.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.