What are the implications of Rule 25.11 when it comes to striking paragraphs 6 and 7 of the Amended Statement of Defence?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Oblates of Mary Immaculate, St. Peter's Province v. 3220605 Canada Inc. (Life Lease Associates of Canada), 2007 CanLII 36826 (ON SC):

Contrary to the Plaintiffs’ interpretation of Rule 25.11 (supra), paragraphs 6 and 7 of the Amended Statement of Defence are not scandalous, frivolous or vexatious. By reviewing the full text of Justice Epstein’s clarifications of Rule 25.11 in George v. Harris, supra, it is clear that portions of pleadings will be struck where they have basically no relevance whatsoever and are simply argumentative or inserted only for colour. This is anything but the case here.

Other Questions


What is the test for striking a motion to amend or amend a Claim? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the main defences used in a statement of defence in a real estate transaction? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the implications of the Pierringer Order and the amended statement of claim? (Ontario, Canada)
Is it possible to amend a third party claimant’s Statement of Defence to allow for contribution and indemnity under s. 1 of the Negligence Act? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court award substantial indemnity costs on a motion to amend a statement of defence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for striking the statement of defence in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
If a defence expert has been videotaped at trial, is the defence expert required to be reviewed by the other defence expert? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party seek to amend or amend their affidavit to support a motion to amend the original document? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to amend or strike a pleading? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff permitted to amend or amend an articling student’s affidavit? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.