Is there any case law that states that documents that are not relevant to the pleadings must be shown in the Affidavit of Documents?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from B.E.M. Fireworks Inc. v. Edward Dworkin Distributors Limited, 2009 CanLII 9408 (ON SC):

It is trite law that documents that have a semblance of relevance to the issues in the pleadings must be listed in the Affidavit of Documents, including those documents over which a privilege is claimed and all Schedule A documents must be produced, preferably before discovery. (Elguindy v. Prince)[1]

Other Questions


When dealing with documents referred to in an affidavit is not necessary to consider relevance to the questions in issue? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a party required to disclose in its affidavit of documents (Schedule C) all documents formerly in their possession but no electronic or paper copy? (Ontario, Canada)
What relevance does relevance exist in the context of relevance? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party who fails to assert privilege over a document be served with a supplementary affidavit of documents in which the privilege is properly claimed? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a pleading containing claims of misrepresentation be pleaded more particularity than other pleadings? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the relevant paragraphs in the Weiler Affidavit? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on pit bull legislation in the United States? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to plead to plead the particulars of misrepresentation in their statement of claim? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law regarding disclosure on a shareholder’s affidavit on a security for costs motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the difference between the pleadings in paragraphs 32 and 33 and 33 of the pleading conclusions of law? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.