What is the effect of the "pragmatic and functional methodology" used to determine the appropriate standard of review in an appeal?

Canada (Federal), Canada

The following excerpt is from Toronto (City) v. C.U.P.E., Local 79, [2003] 3 SCR 77, 2003 SCC 63 (CanLII):

61 While I agree with Arbour J.’s disposition of the appeal, I am of the view that the administrative law aspects of this case require further discussion. In my concurring reasons in Chamberlain v. Surrey School District No. 36, [2002] 4 S.C.R. 710, 2002 SCC 86 (CanLII), I raised concerns about the appropriateness of treating the pragmatic and functional methodology as an overarching analytical framework for substantive judicial review that must be applied, without variation, in all administrative law contexts, including those involving non-adjudicative decision makers. In certain circumstances, such as those at issue in Chamberlain itself, applying this methodological approach in order to determine the appropriate standard of review may in fact obscure the real issue before the reviewing court.

Other Questions


On appeal from an appeal from a judicial review, what is the role of the appeal judge in determining the proper standard of review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is patent unreasonableness the appropriate standard in reviewing evidence at a review of a severe and prolonged disability analysis? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does a named class representative's notice of appeal stating that he is appealing individually and on behalf of the other named plaintiffs in a class action be sufficient to effect an appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's corroboration determination in determining that Page 6 of the National Crime Act is valid? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the appropriate standard of review in an application for judicial review? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for the purpose of determining whether a "sham" is reviewed in the absence of palpable error? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
In a motion to appeal against a jury verdict in a personal injury case brought by a defendant who failed to raise his objections to the trial judge on the motion, can the appellant appeal to the Court of Appeal to review the motion by the same judge? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the effect of a frivolous appeal against the Court of Appeal's decision to dismiss the appeal on the grounds of mootness? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining the appropriate standard of review for each of the questions before a judge? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for appeal review of an award of damages for damages awarded in a personal injury case? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.