The adequate alternative remedy principle was fully discussed in Harelkin v. University of Regina, 1979 CanLII 18 (SCC), [1979] 2 S.C.R. 561, at p. 586, where Beetz J., for the majority, held at p. 576 that "even in cases involving lack of jurisdiction", the prerogative writs maintain their discretionary nature. Dickson J. (as he then was, dissenting), took a narrower view of discretion in the case of jurisdictional error (pp. 608-9). He nevertheless concluded, at p. 610, that where a jurisdictional error "derives from a misinterpretation of a statute, a statutory right of appeal may well be adequate". ...
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.