What is reasonable and what is reasonable in the context of a claim in a personal injury case?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Saskatoon (City) v. Plaxton, Loewen & Wiebe, 1989 CanLII 4433 (SK CA):
If what is reasonable entails a concern for the amount of the account, as is stated by Hall, J.A., in Speers v. Hagemeister, supra, then there is no evidence before us upon which it can be concluded it was unreasonable.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a defendant set up a defence for personal injury in a personal injury case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In a personal injury action, is there any case law where a defendant admitted the allegations in the statement of claim and submitted to the relief claimed? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the principles of causation in the context of a personal injury claim? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the general rule of common law in the context of personal injury cases? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for personal injury claims in a motor vehicle accident case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for success in a personal injury action brought by a farmer who claims to have lost his right to land on his land? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a person be added as a party in a personal injury action where the outcome of the action directly affects him? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for claiming unjust enrichment in the context of a claim made by Alice against her former partner in her name? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the legal test for admitting fresh evidence in a personal injury case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of requiring payment to a defendant in a personal injury case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
