A great deal of evidence was led by counsel for both parties as to work done at this point some months after the accident and that the defendant had subsequently erected guard rails at this culvert. I agree with the learned trial judge that this evidence was not admissible for subsequent repair is not per se either an admission of or evidence of previous disrepair. Vide Fuller v. Niagara Falls (1920) 48 OLR 332.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.