Is the review clause in the 2010 Order valid in law and should not be applied?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Lochhead v. Lochhead, 2014 BCSC 962 (CanLII):
The claimant makes a similar argument that the review clause in the 2010 Order is not valid in law and should not be applied, despite the absence of an appeal, given the authority of Leskun v. Leskun, 2006 SCC 25. This argument is susceptible to the same criticism.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by an appellate court in reviewing child support orders? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review to apply in a judicial review? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by an appellate court reviewing a decision of a trial judge concerning matters of custody and access? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BCSC review the applicable standard of review apply to a point of law arising in interlocutory proceedings? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a final spousal support order under section 15.2(3) of the Attorney General's Guidelines for Divorce Review Order enforceable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a desk order pronounced on February 28, 2011 a dismissal of a request for a custody order and a support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the standard of review apply to a review of a Workers’ Compensation Appeal Tribunal decision to which the decision was patently unreasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that the September 2018 Order provides for a review of child support is not necessarily decisive of the nature of the order? (British Columbia, Canada)
