What material was before Mr Punnett at the time he granted the interim order dated May 6, 2011?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from A.B.Z. v. A.L.F.A., 2014 BCSC 1453 (CanLII):
No submissions were made regarding the material that was before Mr. Justice Punnett at the time he granted the order dated May 6, 2011. The interim order is presumed to be correct at the time it was made: Tedham v. Tedham, 2003 BCCA 600, at para. 62.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal framework governing interim applications for an interim order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the submission of the Respondent on an interim order to order a primary parent to continue as the primary parent of the child pending trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a numbered company to obtain an interim order to obtain a winding-up order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of a Master’s decision to grant an interim order against a father? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the court consider when ordering a table amount for the purposes of an interim order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of an interim preservation order granted under section 9 of the BC Civil Forfeiture Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a desk order pronounced on February 28, 2011 a dismissal of a request for a custody order and a support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the date of retroactivity in a consent order apply when the respondent’s financial circumstances materially changed? (British Columbia, Canada)
