The bank submits that it should not have costs awarded against it. It relies on TD Bank v. Yousefie, 2014 ONSC 561 at para. 81 for the proposition that a moving party on an ex parte motion cannot be expected to anticipate every possible defence and to disclose those to the court. While I agree with that proposition, that is not the situation here. The bank is not being criticized because it failed to disclose every possible defence. It disclosed none. Moreover, it presented facts to the court in a misleading manner.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.