Can a vendor lose the protection of caveat emptor if found negligent or fraudulent misrepresentation?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from 846-6718 Canada Inc. v. 1779042 Interior Ltd, 2018 ONSC 1563 (CanLII):

The court in Swayze v. Robertson [2001] 0.T.C. 186 (S.C.) para 39, held the vendor lost the protection of caveat emptor upon determination of its negligence or fraudulent misrepresentation.

Other Questions


When a vendor consigns goods to a vendor, and sends a bill of lading to his own correspondent, and gives no delivery order to the vendor, does the vendor have a right to possession of the goods? (Ontario, Canada)
What authorities have been found to be negligent misrepresentation in the context of a claim for damages from a plaintiff? (Ontario, Canada)
What are some cases where a lawyer who drafted a will negligently was found liable to a beneficiary who did not receive an inheritance because of the lawyer’s negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a pleading of negligent misrepresentation in a claim for damages arising in negligence simpliciter? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the general rule of caveat emptor apply in circumstances where there has been misrepresentation? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a representor be liable for negligent misrepresentation? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for caveat emptor in real estate transactions? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current requirement for a successful claim of negligent misrepresentation? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a charge of dangerous driving under s. 249 of the Criminal Code constitute a gross negligence of gross negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the elements of the tort of negligent pre-contractual misrepresentations? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.